Louise Oxley: Range Light

South Launceston: Walleah, 2025, 67pp.

There are seventeen years between Buoyancy, Louise Oxley’s second book, and this new one. There were five years between her first book, Compound Eye – little larger than a chapbook, really – and Buoyancy. Barely over a hundred poems in more than twenty years must make Louise Oxley the most restrained of Australia’s better poets. This new book, while a little thinner than Buoyancy, has poems of as high a standard and has a lot of connections with that earlier book. Buoyancy, for example begins with poems of orientation. In the first poem, “Surfacing”, a whale breaches off the southern coast – “where the Nullarbor stops” – moving from sea to air but also going backwards in time because, as the poem points out, whales are descended from land animals that returned to the sea: “it’s as if the earth were too hard, / walking too painful”. The poem has a surprising conclusion where what seems like a meditation on a fellow creature with the capacity to inhabit air as well as water suddenly becomes about going backwards in time – reversing the direction of evolution. It also shifts to add a personal element to this reverse evolution:

. . . . .
                     as if
to open the throat and cry, to draw breath
through the mouth and utter, to close a hand and grasp
were nothing, and I wish I, like you,
were a thing of the past.

These personal issues come into the poems of Buoyancy in subtle and sophisticated ways. The very section titles, for example, “Surfacing”, “Line of Sight”, “Division”, “Extraction” and “Buoyancy” can be read as a lightly coded narrative of separation from one’s partner and the final section interprets “buoyancy”, not as an ability to inhabit water and air so much as a spiritual state achieved after a happy love affair in Wales.

I focus on Buoyancy here because Range Light operates in a rather similar way. The first two poems are poems of orientation. The first, “Orbit”, is stylistically unusual in Oxley’s poetry in that it is a very abstract and denotative piece:

Orbit: a rut made by a wheel. To go
forwards or backwards, the wheel must turn. 

Forwards, not backwards, is the way you think
you want to go. High overhead, three eagles

circle. You want to go with them, eagle
parents and young, take the path they take.

The path: child around mother, moon around earth.
It’s a matter of gravity; eagles

feel gravity in their feathers. They read
turbulence, the true shape of clouds, understand

lift and bank, know the shape of their own wings.
One day the mother’s gone. But watch and wait.

Watch the sky and wait. Remember, you can want
to go back, to see her again. The wheel must turn.

It’s a complex piece. As I read it, the eagle mother is lost, probably shot, and an observer might want the wheel of time to run backwards so that the family is once more complete but unfortunately it only goes in one direction, a direction that leads to partners separating and children growing up and going on their own orbits too. “Forwards not backwards is the way you think / you want to go” says the poem at the beginning, but there are experiences of loss and separation that make you want to go back. I suppose it balances time as progress with time as memory. And then there is the unifying image of circularity: the rut made by a wheel and the fact that the three eagles circle in a domestic equivalent of the moon orbiting the earth.

The book’s second poem, “Self-Portrait with Oars”, though in a different style, touches on this question of direction, of going backwards. It focusses on the fact that, when rowing a boat, we face not where we are going but where we have been. In a sense we are doomed to “want to go back” while we go forward. It’s probably inevitable that the poem will reference the Aymara people of the Bolivian Andes who are famous for conceptualising the past as lying in front of us – because we can see and know it – and the future as lying behind us where it can’t be seen. Ultimately, although it meshes with the idea of direction and is an important theme in the book, this seems to me essentially a wryly comic poem which mocks the indecision between wanting to go forward and wanting to go back. Here, the poet while rowing, eyes closed to experience – “the sun illuminating / the blood in my eyelids” – finishes up going around in circles.

Once you become aware of this interest in direction, it’s revealling how frequently it recurs. Although the title poem, “Range Light”, belongs to the poems in the book which are either ekphrastic or generally concerned with art – this one imagines an artist having the power to make the spirit of an object like a mini-lighthouse transmigrate and find a new life in an art installation – it’s worth remembering that the object itself in this poem is part of an apparatus to enable sailors to know when they are in the correct channel. There’s an allegory about correct directions there that makes the poem justify its rank as the book’s title.

There are also poems in the first section whose titles alone alert the reader to their interest in the direction of travel: “Riding Out” and “Round Trip”. The former describes horse-riding with a friend, someone who shares a knowledge of the past: “Comfort is in our old knowledge: / our past demands to be left undisturbed”. The ride is a trip forward with the knowledge of the past as a shared experience but at a certain point the pair separate to circle back to their respective homes:

. . . . . 
We aim to ride a circuit,
not to return the way we came.

. . . . . 

A yellow-topped post is where our paths diverge.
A goodbye hug’s precarious. The ground is rough;
the horses shift and swing, sensing home.
I scan the hills for words. You’re returning to a house
that’s all but empty, where the man you chose for kindness
will be where you left him by the window,
in his recliner, staring out. Around us,
peppermint gums hang limp and bluish in still air.
Their trunks, as smooth as human skin,
have creased somehow in growing.

That final image of the gum’s bark emphasises that growing – the inevitable movement forward in time – occurs despite the fact that the riders circle back.

“Round Trip”, describing travelling on Bruny Island, seems on the surface like a dense description of things seen while journeying. In this it resembles, “Invitation to Earnscliffe”, an earlier poem. But again, the issue of forwards and backwards appears. A “remnant cemetery” records the names of the past dead including “Hannah Green, 4 months” and the poem imagines her in the present when it looks for a simile for the way a cloud changes shape:

. . . . . 
                                 The sky’s an open, dizzying blue
and seems still, but everything, as ever, is in motion. The one

cloud stretches, dropping bits; becomes a fancy chicken
trailing tatty pantaloons, as Hannah might have, had she lived.

A For Sale sign’s appeared outside the homestead sheds: Your chance for boutique
farmstay or new eco-home, where sheep once clattered in for shearing

and onions hung to dry. For now, the brazen pumpkins fruit, three
cabbage moths twist up and up, the green rosella must be taken off the road.

Everything about the environment speaks change, the process whereby English-style farms become rougher working farms and then become boutique ex-farms, where cemeteries become tourist sites and ‘everything is, as ever, in motion”. Perhaps an earlier reference to the sea whose continuous waves leave a line of sea-wrack is a reference to these processes of change. But within the remorseless movement forward there is also a sense of circularity. Hannah Green can be brought into the present and the farms move from heritage creations and eventually back to boutiques. For this reason, the journey which seems to go in one direction – from “Alonnah to Lunawanna” as the epigraph says – is also a round trip though it is only ever described as a one-way journey.

Moving simultaneously backward and forward informs a number of the poems which are about the poet’s personal situation. “Towards Equinox”, the final poem of the book’s third section, deals openly with the partner’s leaving – “you’re three years gone from here, after all”- but imagines in a guide-post reflector lit up by the setting sun, an evil eye watching over everything done on the property, always ready to criticise. This is all followed by a violent storm, nicely symbolic of an emotional state, which, occurring at the equinox seems to be a way of offering two paths: one back into memory and despair and another forward towards a new strength. The second part of the poem is devoted to some symbolic daffodils, flattened in the storm but kept in a vase. Those in the open will survive storms and have a strong life as time moves beyond the equinox into spring. Their fate is positive, as the end of the poem shows – “Virescent, they’re called. Greenish. Becoming green” – but the issue is whether the poet identifies herself with the damaged flowers in the vase, having “a brief afterlife” or with the thriving flowers of the open field. Perhaps we aren’t supposed to imagine an answer to this question but instead see the poem as expressing both doubts and hopes.

Range Light is not only a book about directions, though. Another of its concerns is the issue of observation. It comes up as method in dense descriptive poems like “Round Trip” but also in “Invitation to Earnscliffe” – another poem where the observer is moving – and “Heifers”. The book’s second section, “The Observatory Shore”, is a set of poems in different forms deriving from the book by Jaques Labillardiere describing facets of Australia from his position on the ship searching for La Perouse. He is an observer par excellence and the poems try to convey something of his precision. There is also a section of poems about paintings – as there was in Buoyancy – though here they are all about works by Brett Whitely.

The final section of the book has poems which are more outward looking, more concerned with contemporary issues of living in the world although these could be squeezed into a paradigm which saw them as looking at the ways in which a colonial past can co-exist with the present-day world. In “The Corvids”, black crows (a potent image in Tasmania) make a constant racket that seems as though “they scold us, like hard truths”. “Thistle Villanelle” looks at the way thistles spread over cleared and damaged ground using it as an allegory of colonialism. In simple condemnations like these the position of the poet is important and it’s good to see Oxley including herself amongst the colonialists – “And so, weedstock myself, I labour with mattock and spade / undoing indifference, re-doing penance and repair”. “How to Treat a Dairy Cow” is about treating domestic animals with a love and care they rarely receive and this treatment of animals is the subject of “Girl on a Fencepost” a description of one of those much-watched YouTube shorts in which a little girl forms (or exploits) an attachment with horses by singing to them:

. . . . . 
Her open palm moves up and down
between the horse’s eyes,
a pressure the animal leans into.

It blinks more slowly. The eyelids
close and soften. The child’s small fingers
come to rest around the bony nose

that could unseat her with the slightest push.
But no, the horse nods off,
the head dropping in little increments,

the tufted muscular lip twitching
in her lap in sleep. A second horse
standing by just out of frame

approaches now . . . She sees the pony coming, turns
and offers it that same small open hand,
her smile beneath the jammed-on hat

fearless, tender, as if
a better world were in her power.

This, and poems like “Stone of Return” in which an aboriginal man transfers the red of a piece of ochre – which has the power to “give and receive” – to her wrist, or “Seedling” with its celebration of the carefully kept plants migrants and refugees have brought, makes for a more upbeat conclusion to the book. But it’s hard not to feel that the dominant key of the book is a minor one, fretting over separation and the tension between facing a life in the future and living backwards in a more satisfying past.

Louise Oxley: Buoyancy

Melbourne: Five Islands Press, 2008, 87pp.

Buoyancy is Louise Oxley’s second book. Her first, Compound Eye, was published in Five Island Press’s admirable New Poets series in 2003. I mention this because the books in that series are little more than pamphlets and Oxley’s entire output (she is now near her mid-fifties) thus amounts to little more than a hundred pages. There are poets who produce that much every two years. One of the results of producing so little, so carefully, though, is that there is a high degree of consistency within the poems: they may often be very different as poems, but reading them we are clearly in the same world and it’s a world that one can get to know and admire.

It’s instructive to look at the first poems of each book. Compound Eye begins with “Night, Connelly’s Marsh”:

a plover is grating the dark
into stars      the cry springs
like blood along a scratch

I trip on a loose plank
on the jetty      the wood is tense
the moon askance

who lied first to whom?

your letters have become
mere shoals of fingerlings
small change

a cormorant will pocket them

I’ll wait here for a while
between breaths
spanning tides

It’s what might be called an expressionist piece. The driving force is personal pain and it is allowed to distort perceptions of the natural world so that the plover’s call grates and arises like blood along a new scratch. It is also a short-breathed, tense poem – the kind that talented beginners often produce before they get the confidence to inhabit larger, calmer structures. Given how good the other poems of Compound Eye are, this may be no more than an accident: no doubt all these features could be justified mimetically so that lack of personal confidence is seen as reflected in a lack of syntactic and stylistic confidence.

Buoyancy begins with a poem about watching a whale breach off the Great Australian Bight. As with “Night, Connelly’s Marsh”, everything is set in a liminal site: the continent drops away into sea and the whale emerges from water into air. Unlike the first poem, though, there is a relaxed, “long-breathed” quality about “Surfacing”. It too might, of course, be mimetically responding to the whale’s breath, but it is really a matter of poetic confidence that all the details are sufficiently animated by meaning and observational precision so that the poem never loses its momentum:

Here’s where the Nullarbor stops.
As if it suddenly forgot itself, the land
falls into the sea and I am groundless.
You are too, but you belong there;
you come out of the blue like a dreamer from sleep,
breaking from its lilt and swing, lift and sink.
Where the elements give way, nebulae of spume
drift off, constellations from the edge of space.
With a headful of echoes and krill
and a crystalline eye angled against refraction
you are making sense of latitude and current,
sizing up the horizon from below. Bejewelled
in barnacles, breaching worlds,
you are all collision, elision,
a balancing act on a fluke, a moment of trance, 
an evolutionary quirk.
. . . . .

The brief reference to the self in the third line warns us that we are still in the same world where it is personal distress that is driving the poems and this is taken up in the last lines:

it’s as if the earth were too hard,
walking too painful, as if
to open the throat and cry, to draw breath
through mouth and utter, to close a hand and grasp
were nothing, and I wish I, like you,
were a thing of the past.

These represent some kind of climactic shock but there is nothing trivially dramatic about it. The magic of “Surfacing” seems to me that it balances the personal and natural world very complexly and beautifully. At one level the careful observation of the animal can be read as the mind distracting itself before it returns to more pressing matters. This would make it something like Rossetti’s “The Woodspurge”. But there is a more intimate relationship between whale and viewer than between plant and poet. The whale has, among mammalian features such as a sex-life, a quality of balance which is a result of buoyancy. And the book’s title alone warns us that this is going to be one of the reference points of this world.

We meet it as early as the second poem of Compound Eye, “Paper Nautilus”. These shells, washed up periodically on the beach, seem to be used as symbols of poems. Interestingly, since they are empty, they represent poetry made from loss, “a tentative tracing of absence / the rare orchids of loving words”. Even more interestingly, and as an example of the kind of balance between the personal and natural that Oxley does so well, they induce metaphors within the poet herself:

Now I think of a spooked mare
tucking her tail under
or a fair-haired girl in a french plait

And the shell’s rising to the surface (and to the surface of the consciousness of the poet) is, like the whale’s surfacing, a metaphor as well as a reality:

she sings to the surface
rising surely as a phrase long practised
the sea’s dark lyric
never failing beneath her

“Paper Nautilus” seems to come halfway between “Night, Connelly’s Marsh” and “Surfacing” in that, though an extended poem, it does have staccato quality as though observations were being thrown out serially. But it also has a surprising ending which, like that of “Surfacing”, returns us to the personal though in a way so radical that I am not at all sure what is happening: at worst it remains a bracingly abrupt surprise for the reader:

Here you are at fifteen
leaving the water
a wonder of lengthening limbs

seeing the camera
your head on one side
those childbearing hips that have
so far as I know
remained empty

The obsession with rising and floating makes some sense of a powerful early poem, “Voice Over”, the first poem by Louise Oxley that I remember reading (I included it in the 2003 Best Australian Poetry). It is a “full” narrative, rather than a lyric poem with narrative elements, telling of the rescued sailor who has been alone in the sea, treading water for so long, that he continues to do so in bed in the submarine which has rescued him. Eventually he stops by being encouraged to think of walking home, of “surfacing” into the “real” world:

. . . . . 
It was the doctor’s silvery
potion of reason that broke his stride.
He was walking now, uphill, along
the line of argument
and it was growing dark.
Someone had ploughed the home paddock
in his absence; breakers of loam
clung to his boots. Upstairs a light was on.
She would be bent to her sewing.
He raised his eyes.

“Buoyancy” itself is a poem about observation – and thus about poetry. The personal element is very subdued but the line “You taught me this as we waited for platypus, None came” establishes both human relationships and a setting of absence – in this case, non-appearance. The poem seems to be saying that the creatures which have buoyancy live balanced between elements and their life is involved in making “ecstatic circles”. It concludes:

A wallaby thumped once, waiting to come down for a drink.
Then the silence of moss, the forest spongy with yielding,

while bull-ants worked their songless chain-gang
along the log where we sat suspended over water,

the beetles too, marooned, held by the skin of the lake
in a planetary gyre, a half-eye on one life and a half on the other.

A conclusion that introduces another element in this poetic universe, that of sight and sight-lines. It reminds us that the whale of “Surfacing” has an “eye angled against refraction” and is able to make some visual sense of both worlds. There are a lot of poems about seeing in “Buoyancy”. “Line of Sight”, for example, deals with the man who is in charge of a microwave broadcast tower. He is balanced between earth and air transmitting the earthbound schlock of “soaps or ads or dating games or news” through the air and “his wavelengths, like the days he works in / are short and do not bend.” And finally there is “The Radiolarian Atlas” devoted to Haeckel’s research on plankton. Here the emphasis is on the miraculous creatures whose complex shapes not only evoke metaphors (“galaxy and daisy, asteroid and carapace”) but also suggest there is a contiguity between the structures of the universe at all scales. However, it will come as no surprise, as the reader gets to know Oxley’s world better, that there is an emphasis on the “narrow shaft of light” inside the microscope and on the balance required to wade out into a sea “a blue so far-flung and fantastical / that fish might swim in sea or sky” to collect the creatures in a net:

The water is cold, but not as cold
as it was yesterday, and it is rising.
White water thumps at your knees and thighs,
pushes at your pubis, navel and breast,
foams at your throat. Remain on the seabed.
It is the floor of truth.

Straight lines and curves are the subject of a fascinating poem, “Beelines”. This turns out, on some inspection, to be a single-sentenced, impeccably rhymed Petrarchan sonnet and it’s tempting to read a mimetic purpose behind that fact since a single sentence is a straight line and a complex rhyming scheme is a series of repetitions which, I suppose, makes some sort of circle. And the poem is about the straight line that the bee makes on its approach to the blossom (the source of the cliche “to make a beeline”) contrasted with the circular dances it makes to provide information and the macro-fact that spring, when all this is going on, is a result of the turning of the earth:

So this is the noise earth makes, turning again;
this fine-tuned, coming-in-to-land, abdomen down
heading into blossom, threads of drowsy sound
shuttling towards and away in almost-unison,
each steady furred excursion into talc-scented pollen
ending in intimate probe and suck, the pointed black
legs that brush past and steal, but only to give back
something new, something known yet wanted, the swollen
certainty of honey, even as under them petals fall
and earth spins into its small
yearly miracle outside our bathroom window,
the tree hovering once more and blown
with whiteness, as if a cloud had come
to settle there, and begun to hum.

Finally, in this catalogue of straight lines and rises, descents and balances, there is “Walking to Witch’s Leap” which might well be my favourite poem from this book – though there are plenty of contenders. It is a forty line, single sentence poem that enacts the notion of falling that it is so obsessively about:

                              because down is where it goes,
on earth anyway, streams to the sea or underground,
leaf and seed to earth and earth to leaf and the seed
the currawong bounds for with his heavy grace,
his cadenced elbowing bound; even cadence
once meant fall . . .

This lovely hymn to entropy is strung between a first line which uses the word “upended” and a final line which finishes with “end up”.

As I’ve said, the great quality in Oxley’s poetry is continually to find ways of respecting the natural world – in all its incomprehensible alienness (well catalogued in the poem about the radiolaria) – while, at the same time, finding ways to speak personally. It is a matter of balance where what I have called an expressionist poetry – where intensity of emotion distorts all perceptions of the natural world which are used as correlatives – is only at one end of the scale. Almost every one of her poems seems to face up to this problem and to attempt a unique solution. You have the general initial impression that the dominant emotional state which seeks expression is one of disappointment and loss. “Things to tell you: day 193” is one of these, almost morbidly built around absence. And “Phase” is about handing in divorce papers one day short of what would have been a twenty-year marriage. One poem which cleverly balances the natural world and the inner is “Waiting with birds: three lessons” where, again, the lessons of the birds – in sequence, according to my reading of the poem: “go about your ordinary life”, “don’t fantasize, look to yourself” and “live in the present” – are a way of dealing with a mind-numbing sense of emptiness.

But absence and emptiness are not the only sources of these poems. There are plenty which rise out of plenitude. “Border Country”, which concludes the book, is a sequence of poems about happy love in Wales and contains a fine sestina and a sonnet. Perhaps this is a nod to the Welsh poetic tradition which encourages a high level of poetic formalism or perhaps poems arising from happiness need tight forms to control them. And “Horsetails” is a really lovely poem that should be enlisted in the slim notional volume of great Australian love poems. It starts with a long, oblique, ten line description of a horse in a paddock and of horsetails in the sky before modulating to a poem of happy, physical love before concluding:

Soon, you say, our window will be white with plum-blossom
and you talk of the coming again of our first season
and the hen-run you will build under the apple trees.
But I am already embracing your word,
riding horsetails over the Sweetwater Hills, galloping upwards
on the inadvertent joyful possessive adjective our.

On balance, despite the loveliness of poems like this, I think absence is the more powerful generative state in Oxley’s poetry. Perhaps this is the case throughout the corpus of the world’s poetry since it reminds us of the processes of inevitable entropy and, perhaps, absences induce poems to fulfil them more easily than happinesses induce poems to express them. It will be interesting to see what happens in Oxley’s poetic world of the future, but I am very confident that there will be not one but a series of solutions and that they will be sure-footed, balanced, buoyant, intelligent.